Roles & Responsibilities
- Overview
- Diocese of Canterbury
- Church of England
- Anglican Communion
- Ecumenical Relationships
- Inter Faith
- Lambeth Palace
- Archbishop as Patron
- Archbishop's Awards
- The Archbishop's Examination in Theology
-
House of Lords »
- Archbishop's speech at House of Lords Debate - Good Childhood Inquiry Report
- Archbishop calls to protect the poorest from the effects of economic downturn
- Archbishop Criticises 'Indefensible' Treatment of Young People in Prison
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill »
- House of Lords Speech Opposing 'Super Casinos'
- The Churches Role in the Civic Life of the Nation : House of Lords Debate
- Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill
- Chaplaincy in Immigration Detention Centres
- Debate on Africa, Millennium Development Goals and Causes of Conflict
- Criminal justice - the social purpose of sentencing
- Tribute to Lord Williams of Mostyn
- Children and Parents
- Archbishop takes seat in House of Lords
- The Archbishops from Augustine to Williams
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill
Tuesday 15 January 2008
The Archbishop attended the first day in the Lords of the Report Stage of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. He spoke during the debate on a government amendment to change the name of 'inter-species' embryos to 'human-admixed' embryos. In doing so, he joined many Peers, including Lord Alton and Lord Tebbit who had expressed concerns about embryo research involving the mixing of human and animal elements. Throughout the passage of the Bill, concerns on this issue and others relating to 'saviour siblings', the impact on fatherhood and the need for a National Commission on Bioethics, had been raised many times by the Lords Spiritual.
Transcript of the Archbishop's intervention:
My Lords, I begin by apologising to the House for the fact that I am obliged to leave the Chamber before five o'clock this afternoon. I want just to echo some of the anxieties that have been raised in the past few minutes. I share entirely the unease of the noble Lord, Lord Tebbit, about the phrase, "the human end of the spectrum", which seems to introduce a very unhelpful element of uncertainty. Given that some of the major moral reservations around this Bill, which have been expressed broadly both in the country and in your Lordships' House, pivot upon the concern that this is legislation which is gradually but inexorably moving towards a more instrumental view of how we may treat human organisms, any lack of clarity in this area seems fatally compromising and ambiguous. I hope that we can have some further clarity in this afternoon's discussion.